|
Post by Beachguy on May 10, 2017 9:51:48 GMT -5
Give rule breakers 3 strikes and out , they may come back but can't let them break rules , it shows they do not respect the admins or the forum as their hearts are full of hate
|
|
|
Post by pgantioch on May 10, 2017 15:44:21 GMT -5
Give rule breakers 3 strikes and out , they may come back but can't let them break rules , it shows they do not respect the admins or the forum as their hearts are full of hate Take a deep breath, BG. The ignore feature is your friend.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2017 13:35:29 GMT -5
CIVIL DISCOURSE For what it's worth
Definition: "Engagement in discourse (conversation) intended to enhance understanding"
Kenneth J. Gergen suggests that "it requires the respect of other participants, such as the reader. It neither diminishes the other's moral worth, nor questions their good judgment; it avoids hostility, direct antagonism, or excessive persuasion; it requires modesty and an appreciation for the other participants' experiences". (wikipedia)
I think most of us do our best to exercise civil discourse despite our disagreements, but a few seem to have no grasp of the concept. That's unfortunate for all because there seems to be no effort made toward "enhancing understanding". Of course, we all fall short at times. But, I've seen a lot of comments lately that I wouldn't consider conducive to discourse, much less civility.
Just sayin'
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Aug 5, 2017 8:54:45 GMT -5
This is not a prefect Country or prefect people or prefect world or prefect forum but people will be people and they make a forum work , not all will like all words spoken as all people speak their minds , should the speech in a post be checked by Admin before a posting ? , i say no but if words found to be unfit for forum by a Admin then delete with a word to the poster
|
|
|
Post by jamesn on Aug 5, 2017 11:11:22 GMT -5
This is not a prefect Country or prefect people or prefect world or prefect forum but people will be people and they make a forum work , not all will like all words spoken as all people speak their minds , should the speech in a post be checked by Admin before a posting ? , i say no but if words found to be unfit for forum by a Admin then delete with a word to the poster BG, I'm glad to see that once again, the reports of [your] death have been greatly exaggerated!
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Aug 5, 2017 15:54:57 GMT -5
This is not a prefect Country or prefect people or prefect world or prefect forum but people will be people and they make a forum work , not all will like all words spoken as all people speak their minds , should the speech in a post be checked by Admin before a posting ? , i say no but if words found to be unfit for forum by a Admin then delete with a word to the poster BG, I'm glad to see that once again, the reports of [your] death have been greatly exaggerated!HAHA , only ones wishes & hopes , thanks jamesn but many have me , hey i guess i can post about them
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2017 22:04:57 GMT -5
I have a question about polls on the forum. Below rule no. 4 is this statement.
"If controversial issues arise, a poll will be created and the members will decide the issue."
A poll created in the recent past was not seen through to any conclusion that had been decided by the members, but rather arbitrarily deleted by the admin while the vote was in progress. The reason given was that the intention was to just see how members felt about the subject, which in my opinion was misleading members into thinking that they were being called upon to resolve a controversial issue by vote, and a decisive conclusion would reflect the vote.
That issue is irrelevant now, and I understand that admin regrets having created the poll. However, may I suggest when a poll is created it be worded in such a manner that members will clearly understand that their vote will actually decide the issue. And, if it is created as a research vehicle for simply gathering information, it should be stated as such. Perhaps some examples of a standard poll form could be submitted for consideration that would include a clarification line at the bottom such as:
The decision shall be that_________________________________________. or This is only a research poll.
Are there other members who have this question of clarity as well?
|
|
|
Post by jrchico on Aug 12, 2017 22:22:02 GMT -5
I have a question about polls on the forum. Below rule no. 4 is this statement. "If controversial issues arise, a poll will be created and the members will decide the issue." A poll created in the recent past was not seen through to any conclusion that had been decided by the members, but rather arbitrarily deleted by the admin while the vote was in progress. The reason given was that the intention was to just see how members felt about the subject, which in my opinion was misleading members into thinking that they were being called upon to resolve a controversial issue by vote, and a decisive conclusion would reflect the vote. That issue is irrelevant now, and I understand that admin regrets having created the poll. However, may I suggest when a poll is created it be worded in such a manner that members will clearly understand that their vote will actually decide the issue. And, if it is created as a research vehicle for simply gathering information, it should be stated as such. Perhaps some examples of a standard poll form could be submitted for consideration that would include a clarification line at the bottom such as: The decision shall be that_________________________________________. or This is a only a research poll.Are there other members who have this question of clarity as well? Not bad. Would you like to become an Admin. and write them for us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2017 16:22:34 GMT -5
jrchico, I'm honored to be asked, and thank you. With respect I decline. My suggestion for the poll is very simple and wouldn't require more than that the admin include the examples I offered. Other members may have suggestions.
|
|
|
Post by jrchico on Aug 13, 2017 17:02:23 GMT -5
jrchico, I'm honored to be asked, and thank you. With respect I decline. My suggestion for the poll is very simple and wouldn't require more than that the admin include the examples I offered. Other members may have suggestions. Sorry to see you are not interested in becoming an Admin. You seem to fill all of the requirements. Well spoken and level headed, with the time to read the new posts on the forum each day.
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Aug 14, 2017 8:20:45 GMT -5
I suggest members be allowed to iron out the their thoughts with each other in PMs with no rules by Admin , let it be Private between two so no spilling out in open forum .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2017 2:44:22 GMT -5
"PMs with no rules by Admin"
What I've seen is that a PM is a refuge from rules of civility, a safe place to insult, threaten, or offend. Not a an invitation to "iron out" but a call to the back alley.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2017 6:35:05 GMT -5
"PMs with no rules by Admin" What I've seen is that a PM is a refuge from rules of civility, a safe place to insult, threaten, or offend. Not a an invitation to "iron out" but a call to the back alley. Use the block feature, check all the boxes. Take my word for it. You'll feel better about coming here.
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Aug 15, 2017 8:46:33 GMT -5
"PMs with no rules by Admin" What I've seen is that a PM is a refuge from rules of civility, a safe place to insult, threaten, or offend. Not a an invitation to "iron out" but a call to the back alley. Use the block feature, check all the boxes. Take my word for it. You'll feel better about coming here. Not all are cowards , give him credit , i once had a man call me all kinds of really nasty names , after a few talks in PMs we became ok with each other , he is a member here , book it , don't run away , i have respect for non blockers
|
|
|
Post by Beachguy on Aug 15, 2017 8:48:56 GMT -5
"PMs with no rules by Admin" What I've seen is that a PM is a refuge from rules of civility, a safe place to insult, threaten, or offend. Not a an invitation to "iron out" but a call to the back alley. The thread is Suggestions
|
|