|
Post by rob49 on Oct 21, 2017 17:43:16 GMT -5
Sorry, but I do find George's artwork a tad OTT, even though he is obviously talented. Not sorry, I find all your comments WAY UFQ, but then you may be less than a fan. FYI UFQ is Under Fan Quality
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 18:19:01 GMT -5
Sorry, but I do find George's artwork a tad OTT, even though he is obviously talented. Not sorry, I find all your comments WAY UFQ, but then you may be less than a fan. FYI UFQ is Under Fan Quality Oct 21, 2017 15:34:57 GMT -7 cer said: Christopher, you can be a fan without doing OTT tribute videos and art work. I don't understand the mentality of a person who would have you believe he/she is a fan while attempting to belittle others for their devotion. The only explanation that comes to mind is that this person is what I would call a pseudo-fan who's real interest lies elsewhere. The question then is, why is this person here and not elsewhere?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 19:36:03 GMT -5
To point out that I believe a tribute is OTT, particularly after watching the behavior of certain fans playout like Airport Joe, I would say you are missing my point altogether.
Christopher, you also don't get to determine who has the right to be here vs others. I'm a fan, but I just don't go as far as some others go in here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 21:08:35 GMT -5
To point out that I believe a tribute is OTT, particularly after watching the behavior of certain fans playout like Airport Joe, I would say you are missing my point altogether. Christopher, you also don't get to determine who has the right to be here vs others. I'm a fan, but I just don't go as far as some others go in here. Yes, I am missing your point. I only asked why you are here. Show that you really are a fan in some demonstrable way, perhaps by posting something relevant to your admiration of Jackie. I haven't seen anything yet in that regard. Then maybe we can get back to the purpose of this thread- posting Tribute Videos.
|
|
|
Post by rickolsen on Oct 21, 2017 22:10:57 GMT -5
Sorry, but I do find George's artwork a tad OTT, even though he is obviously talented. I agree with you. I have always preferred a photo to a painting. George's paintings of Jackie are a little "Off" to me. They just don't look like Jackie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 22:45:41 GMT -5
Sorry, but I do find George's artwork a tad OTT, even though he is obviously talented. I agree with you. I have always preferred a photo to a painting. George's paintings of Jackie are a little "Off" to me. They just don't look like Jackie. Rick, what are you agreeing with, that George's artwork is over-the-top because it isn't accurate?
|
|
|
Post by rickolsen on Oct 21, 2017 22:50:48 GMT -5
I agree with you. I have always preferred a photo to a painting. George's paintings of Jackie are a little "Off" to me. They just don't look like Jackie. Rick, what are you agreeing with, that George's artwork is over-the-top because it isn't accurate? I don't know what OTT really means. All I'm saying is that when I look at George's Jackie paintings her face is a little off. I thought that's what Cer meant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 22:56:31 GMT -5
Rick, what are you agreeing with, that George's artwork is over-the-top because it isn't accurate? I don't know what OTT really means. All I'm saying is that when I look at George's Jackie paintings her face is a little off. I thought that's what Cer meant. OTT is "Over-The-Top" meaning excessive, beyond acceptable limits, more than one can tolerate, etc. (totally subjective) like art.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 0:45:03 GMT -5
I agree with Rick. I also prefer pictures over paintings and drawings of Jackie being turned into an angel which many have been doing to her since she was just a little girl.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 1:03:41 GMT -5
Yes, I am missing your point. I only asked why you are here. Show that you really are a fan in some demonstrable way, perhaps by posting something relevant to your admiration of Jackie. I haven't seen anything yet in that regard. Then maybe we can get back to the purpose of this thread- posting Tribute Videos. I agree with Rick. I also prefer pictures over paintings and drawings of Jackie being turned into an angel which many have been doing to her since she was just a little girl. As I thought, you've got nothing to show for yourself as a fan. 12 posts have been used on this thread debating your intolerance. This is not in the least entertaining, interesting, or pertinent. Do you have a tribute video to share?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 22, 2017 1:37:49 GMT -5
Christopher, you are calling Cer intolerant, and by association me also because I agreed with her/him using my rick olsen account. She/He is not intolerant and neither am I. She/He doesn't like Jackie angel pictures and neither do I. Angels don't exist. Jackie is a human girl.
Everyone has the right to share their opinion here just as you do. You don't have to agree with them, but you do have to let them speak.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 2:20:00 GMT -5
Christopher, you know nothing about me, and what my faith is or isn't.
For the last time because I don't care for those sort of JE is an angel videos doesn't mean that I'm any less of a fan than you are.
|
|
|
Post by ursus on Oct 22, 2017 4:53:47 GMT -5
Christopher, you can be a fan without doing OTT tribute videos and art work. Although I think that one can be a fan without going OTT, isn't "fan" short for "fanatic" which seems to imply OTT? Sorry that I originally replied to the wrong post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 13:50:20 GMT -5
For those that are not familiar with George, if you didn't know him, you could turn him in for stalking. He has a very large 'wall' of Jackie paintings that is quite remarkable. He also has a very good blog, Jackie Evancho Admirer. He has reviews for albums and concerts back to 2011 that will literally put you in a seat at a performance. It is full of other historical information. The links section will have you reading for days. You need to visit. Jackie has several sites that can be found on Jackiecentral.com. On FB, what I call super fans, such as George, posts their love of Jackie with painting, edits, stories, etc. Sean has me doing jigsaw puzzles. Joe Duerr improves a normal picture into a work of art. Fer, could be one of those famous foreign guys that paint. I hope Jackie knows how many loyal fans she has. www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1538364526190339&set=pb.100000504191244.-2207520000.1508588646.&type=3&theaterI found this selfie of Jackie I do not remember seeing before on George's facebook scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14908343_1527527850607340_64675990187154165_n.jpg?oh=aabfcce208e0c0c022ace11ce604d915&oe=5A6B6454To Rick and cer. This was the latest post ( facebook link) referring to George's artwork to which I thought cer was replying with the remark that George is "OTT". I naturally expected that he/she was referring to the large number of works produced by George which I preferred to call "prolific" in my first reply. Nothing in cer's post was mentioned of "angels" until later in the thread. That apparently was my misunderstanding. My use of the word "intolerance" was in no way referring to one's faith but only to it's being part of my definition of OTT, given to you, Rick- "More than one can tolerate", thus, her "intolerance". It matters not to me that you don't care for his lack of accuracy or that you both prefer photos to artwork as a medium representing one's dedication to Jackie. That's your subjective opinion. cer is saying little more than that he/she thinks "George is OTT", apparently because he made one drawing depicting Jackie with angel wings years ago...BIG DEAL. Furthermore, as ursus mentioned, we're all "fanatics"...GET USED TO IT. cer can speak all he/she wants. I'd like to hear something complimenting Jackie instead of harping on fans. That's my "intolerance", if you want all things equal.
|
|
|
Post by rickolsen on Oct 22, 2017 15:29:12 GMT -5
Christopher, I don't like George's Jackie artwork. In some of it the colors are so overbearing they are garish. In others she looks more like Reese Witherspoon than Jackie Evancho.
|
|