Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2018 23:04:48 GMT -5
I know you will peak like you usually do, so this won't be the last time that you will respond to me I'm sure. I can handle disagreement, too bad that you can't. AHOY for now! You're right, cer. I peaked. I'm no fool. It's wise to keep an eye on you. Blocking is a measure of discipline to refrain from unnecessarily reacting to you. What I can't see is easier to avoid. It has worked well for my peace of mind and that of the membership, I hope. But, sometimes the situation guarantees you've had something to say that requires a need to refute it. This thread has given me cause to view your remarks and an opportunity to watch you dig a hole for yourself, with just a little help from those who know you and you can't outwit. I'll continue to "peak" on occasion just to see what you're up to. As I knew you would peek. I really do think some members in here are way too sensitive dealing with different points of views. If anyone is going to dig a hole for themselves in here, it's more likely to be your pal Rob who has been given the boot in here before. Anyways once again, ahoy to you for now.
|
|
|
Post by agog on Dec 16, 2018 23:34:27 GMT -5
The word is peek, but what does that have to do with Jackie?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 0:21:27 GMT -5
Captured from the video "Bel-Canto -Jackie Evancho -Voice Types 2" click for full view A comment from that video: "Who cares about what label is used to describe a voice type. 'Beautiful ethereal singing' is a voice that transports you to another place. It may give you goose bumps; leave you unable to breath as your soul listens to the singing, until you return to reality at some point, only to find that you have tears running down your cheeks. So far in my life Jackie Evancho is the only one to have done this to me."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 0:33:23 GMT -5
Captured from the video "Bel-Canto -Jackie Evancho -Voice Types 2" click for full view A comment from that video: "Who cares about what label is used to describe a voice type. 'Beautiful ethereal singing' is a voice that transports you to another place. It may give you goose bumps; leave you unable to breath as your soul listens to the singing, until you return to reality at some point, only to find that you have tears running down your cheeks. So far in my life Jackie Evancho is the only one to have done this to me." There are several voices out there that have done it for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 0:42:45 GMT -5
The word is peek, but what does that have to do with Jackie? I could do without the grammar check, but it's been corrected anyways.
|
|
|
Post by agog on Dec 17, 2018 6:54:21 GMT -5
The word is peek, but what does that have to do with Jackie? I could do without the grammar check, but it's been corrected anyways. The word is spelling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 7:48:57 GMT -5
I could do without the grammar check, but it's been corrected anyways. The word is spelling. I actually spelled it correctly, but I used the wrong version of it.... "peak" when it should have been "peek."
|
|
|
Post by agog on Dec 17, 2018 9:26:22 GMT -5
No. Actually you didn't spell it correctly. You spelled "peak" which means the top of the thing under discussion. You were talking about looking at something. That is spelled peek.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 9:31:13 GMT -5
No. Actually you didn't spell it correctly. You spelled "peak" which means the top of the thing under discussion. You were talking about looking at something. That is spelled peek. I did spell peak correctly but I should have used the version peek instead. Rather simple to comprehend.
|
|
|
Post by rickolsen on Dec 17, 2018 9:40:39 GMT -5
No. Actually you didn't spell it correctly. You spelled "peak" which means the top of the thing under discussion. You were talking about looking at something. That is spelled peek. I did spell peak correctly but I should have used the version peek instead. Rather simple to comprehend. Peak and peek are two different words. One is not a version of the other. Peak means the top of something for example Pike's Peak a mountain top. Peek means to look at briefly for example Peek-A-Boo something parents say to infants.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 9:57:40 GMT -5
I did spell peak correctly but I should have used the version peek instead. Rather simple to comprehend. Peak and peek are two different words. One is not a version of the other. Peak means the top of something for example Pike's Peak a mountain top. Peek means to look at briefly for example Peek-A-Boo something parents say to infants. Like I said it should have been "peek." :-)
|
|
|
Post by Julia Trenholm on Dec 17, 2018 10:37:13 GMT -5
I don’t understand the wisdom in joining a forum of a singer just to disagree with that singers fans about her voice. No other artist’s fan group would tolerate that. Both forums are anti forum in every aspect. It’s also completely unacceptable to say that Jackie hasn’t worked very hard. IMO, the problem is that there is a continuum of possible statements that one can make about Jackie or anyone else, from completely over the top to complete hate ("under the bottom" ). Where should the line be drawn? That is very hard to do.
I thought that there was nothing wrong about posting that one was concerned about Jackie drinking at the Sugar Factory, but I now think it matters exactly what one writes, and others have different opinions. I don't think that one can only state that Jackie is the greatest singer in the history of the galaxy.
There are continuums about mostly anything. Admin just stated that it is OK to talk about the Civil War and Vietnam. So, where is the line? Is talking about Trump's first year OK too? I think not, but ... If one can talk about the Vietnam war, can we discuss why a certain person did not serve there?
Most college age young men did not go to Viet Nam. And some who flunked out or graduated from college protection fled to Canada to avoid the draft. Many also got "medical" exemptions from the draft. Trump's were bone spurs. The college riots ended when Nixon ended the draft. No one wanted to go to Viet Nam who weren't professionals, so it ended up by being fought by the working class who did not have the college exemption option.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 12:46:24 GMT -5
A fan --- someone who admires and supports a person (Cambridge Dictionary);
A fan --- an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator. --- an ardent admirer or enthusiast (as of a celebrity or a pursuit) (Merriam - Webster)
Clearly some here that constantly present negative comments believe that these definitions somehow include them as fans of Jackie. This forum is called Jackie Evancho Fans - Where Fans Gather. I believe that is the type of contribution that is meant to be delivered here.
Another forum called Jackie-Amazon - Amazon Revisited is the ideal place for the "critics" with their negative "opinions" to provoke their attention grabbing discord.
Frankly when on this forum site, if you have nothing positive or nice to say ---- then say nothing. Share your negativity with like-minded people on the other forum which thrives in muck and mire. However, I caution you that the site will become boring as there are too few to take an opposing "positive" viewpoint.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 13:08:32 GMT -5
A fan --- someone who admires and supports a person (Cambridge Dictionary); A fan --- an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator. --- an ardent admirer or enthusiast (as of a celebrity or a pursuit) (Merriam - Webster) Clearly some here that constantly present negative comments believe that these definitions somehow include them as fans of Jackie. This forum is called Jackie Evancho Fans - Where Fans Gather. I believe that is the type of contribution that is meant to be delivered here. Another forum called Jackie-Amazon - Amazon Revisited is the ideal place for the "critics" with their negative "opinions" to provoke their attention grabbing discord. Frankly when on this forum site, if you have nothing positive or nice to say ---- then say nothing. Share your negativity with like-minded people on the other forum which thrives in muck and mire. However, I caution you that the site will become boring as there are too few to take an opposing "positive" viewpoint. Folks can hopefully state their opinions in a non harassing way at either site without the ridiculous name calling and even more ridiculous accusations. Now lets all happily carry on. :-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 13:35:11 GMT -5
cer,
Not an accusation or name-calling here. Just an observation, although you may call it harassment if you like. I think you actually believe your own bullschitt.
|
|