Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 8:19:50 GMT -5
This is not being successful when you make videos dressed as a rabbit and you get 15,142 views in a month and a half. I thought that was a polar bear. It is rather ironic that Jackie has gone from doing PBS specials with David Foster to doing videos dressed as an animal. I'm hoping for much better days a head for her.
|
|
|
Post by bounderdriver on Feb 3, 2018 13:03:46 GMT -5
I thought that was a polar bear. It is rather ironic that Jackie has gone from doing PBS specials with David Foster to doing videos dressed as an animal. I'm hoping for much better days a head for her. Her living room video is not a produced tv special. It is an excellent SOCIAL MEDIAS offering. Jackie's social media is a pleasing mix of peeks into her personal life, other talents, and yes even selfies. Others that constantly harp about the 'success' of how the pop tarts and dance mom alums have compared to Jackie may not realize that there may be different objectives at play. I think a good example of this is driving a concours class car and having someone say 'you know, if you just add nitrous and a supercharger, you would go as fast as I think you should go!' See? Different path to a different objective.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 13:33:04 GMT -5
I thought that was a polar bear. It is rather ironic that Jackie has gone from doing PBS specials with David Foster to doing videos dressed as an animal. I'm hoping for much better days a head for her. What's "ironic" is your comment, fan. synonyms for irony: sarcasm, cynicism, ridicule, mockery. Your "hope" seems rather insincere.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 14:52:55 GMT -5
Of course some fans do not want to hear of other artists her age but it is not to be- little her just why the success with artists not having the wonderful tone of voice of Jackie can have more numbers or fans , it is not logical thus there is a reason/reasons for lack of numbers for Jackie ,some fans want to know , it depends on her team to figure it out if they can , don't hold your breath . One thing is Jackie is just boring as can be. It has nothing to do with her genre. Charlotte Kelly is flying past Jackie. She does so many interesting things like traveling around the world. All it took was MZ to tag her in an instagram. That just gave her some exposure but it was her site that a lot of people decide to join because she seems so much more interesting than Jackie. She has 66.1k followers to Jackie's 53.4 and is gaining 585 daily followers to Jackie's 10. " Baithing suit warning: for Jackie very old fans" Charlotte Kelly www.instagram.com/charli_kelly/Jackie Evancho. www.instagram.com/officialjackieevancho/Can't hardly believe that she is able to travel around the world with her friends and doesn't have mommy and daddy holding her hands. Charlotte was born on March 31, 2000 and Jackie April 9, 2000 I guess those 9 days difference in age is why Charlotte is so much more mature. It wouldn't matter how good of a pop singer Jackie was, nobody is going to stick around someone so boring.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 17:42:29 GMT -5
It is rather ironic that Jackie has gone from doing PBS specials with David Foster to doing videos dressed as an animal. I'm hoping for much better days a head for her. What's "ironic" is your comment, fan. synonyms for irony: sarcasm, cynicism, ridicule, mockery. Your "hope" seems rather insincere. Clearly a nerve has been struck. Some times the obvious truth is hard to swallow.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 18:33:48 GMT -5
cer, your comment is a demonstration of ridicule. A poor substitute for "truth".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 19:11:10 GMT -5
cer, your comment is a demonstration of ridicule. A poor substitute for "truth". Oh please, spare me. All you have to observe is where JE was back in 2010 to see where her career stands today. Like I will keep on saying, I hope she gets things turned around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 21:48:46 GMT -5
cer, your comment is a demonstration of ridicule. A poor substitute for "truth". Oh please, spare me. All you have to observe is where JE was back in 2010 to see where her career stands today. Like I will keep on saying, I hope she gets things turned around. I hope you will accept and enjoy whatever she offers in the meantime. The only thing I expect from Jackie is that she will do what she desires for her reasons and purpose. They are not for me to determine.
|
|
|
Post by rob49 on Jun 6, 2018 20:55:21 GMT -5
Comment posted in comment section of a Jackie youtube video
MrB0gart 3 years ago we have an algorithm program at MIT... and we set it to notes on vocal tone and pitch... this girl came out to 99.3 percent average per note....... that was the highest grade out of over a hundred opera and classical crossover singers of any era....... her voice is unreal.... she had minus zero -0 grade on most of her undertones and highs... the minus sign pops up when the computer cannot gauge the note itself... that means lol... that her voice is more exact than the computer...... her gift is not of this world
|
|
|
Post by nipper on Jun 7, 2018 6:40:02 GMT -5
Comment posted in comment section of a Jackie youtube video MrB0gart 3 years ago we have an algorithm program at MIT... and we set it to notes on vocal tone and pitch... this girl came out to 99.3 percent average per note....... that was the highest grade out of over a hundred opera and classical crossover singers of any era....... her voice is unreal.... she had minus zero -0 grade on most of her undertones and highs... the minus sign pops up when the computer cannot gauge the note itself... that means lol... that her voice is more exact than the computer...... her gift is not of this world I remember reading a comment similar to this one on youtube when I first started to listen to Jackie and it may very well be the same one. Do you know which video this comment came from? I have tried to find it over the the years with no success. I figured the video no longer exists or the person who left the comment no longer had an youtube account.
|
|
|
Post by rob49 on Jun 7, 2018 12:49:20 GMT -5
Comment posted in comment section of a Jackie youtube video MrB0gart 3 years ago we have an algorithm program at MIT... and we set it to notes on vocal tone and pitch... this girl came out to 99.3 percent average per note....... that was the highest grade out of over a hundred opera and classical crossover singers of any era....... her voice is unreal.... she had minus zero -0 grade on most of her undertones and highs... the minus sign pops up when the computer cannot gauge the note itself... that means lol... that her voice is more exact than the computer...... her gift is not of this world I remember reading a comment similar to this one on youtube when I first started to listen to Jackie and it may very well be the same one. Do you know which video this comment came from? I have tried to find it over the the years with no success. I figured the video no longer exists or the person who left the comment no longer had an youtube account. Walking in the Air, performed by Jackie Evancho, with beautiful NASA video
|
|
|
Post by seraphin on Jun 7, 2018 22:58:58 GMT -5
I remember reading a comment similar to this one on youtube when I first started to listen to Jackie and it may very well be the same one. Do you know which video this comment came from? I have tried to find it over the the years with no success. I figured the video no longer exists or the person who left the comment no longer had an youtube account. Walking in the Air, performed by Jackie Evancho, with beautiful NASA video I remember reading that the audio technicians at Lincoln Center determined that Jackie was on pitch ~ 98% of the time during her concert there when she was 10 or 11 years old. The technicians had never gotten such nearly perfect readings from any other performer. Sorry, I don't remember where I read this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2018 1:29:25 GMT -5
Comment posted in comment section of a Jackie youtube video MrB0gart 3 years ago we have an algorithm program at MIT... and we set it to notes on vocal tone and pitch... this girl came out to 99.3 percent average per note....... that was the highest grade out of over a hundred opera and classical crossover singers of any era....... her voice is unreal.... she had minus zero -0 grade on most of her undertones and highs... the minus sign pops up when the computer cannot gauge the note itself... that means lol... that her voice is more exact than the computer...... her gift is not of this world First time I've seen this post. I'm not in the habit of arguing with an MIT math program they don't make mistakes. Gave me chills and goosebumps. Thank you MrBOgart whoever you are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2018 17:03:02 GMT -5
Comment posted in comment section of a Jackie youtube video MrB0gart 3 years ago we have an algorithm program at MIT... and we set it to notes on vocal tone and pitch... this girl came out to 99.3 percent average per note....... that was the highest grade out of over a hundred opera and classical crossover singers of any era....... her voice is unreal.... she had minus zero -0 grade on most of her undertones and highs... the minus sign pops up when the computer cannot gauge the note itself... that means lol... that her voice is more exact than the computer...... her gift is not of this world I remember reading a comment similar to this one on youtube when I first started to listen to Jackie and it may very well be the same one. Do you know which video this comment came from? I have tried to find it over the the years with no success. I figured the video no longer exists or the person who left the comment no longer had an youtube account. Just pure luck, nipper and rob, that I found a reference, but not the video (yet). Scroll down to near the bottom to M.B. January 2014, "We have an algorithm at MIT..."
Click the Facebook section, bottom center. The comment appears again on the Facebook page, MrBOgart, November 2, 2015.
jackiecentral.com/thejackieeffect/jackie1.jpg
|
|