Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2017 19:47:10 GMT -5
Jackie should keep her mouth shut publically about the transgender issue. Rick your true self is showing.
|
|
|
Post by rogeraphil on Jul 31, 2017 20:27:47 GMT -5
Jackie should keep her mouth shut publically about the transgender issue. I'll tell you why. It has hurt and is hurting her career. Sales of Two Hearts are one tenth the sales of Awakening. She is losing a lot of fans over it whatever she and Juliet think. Jackie loves music, her fans, and her career. BUT, she loves her sister more. I cringe to even think about it, but if push comes to shove, Jackie will choose her sister OVER her career !!!
|
|
|
Post by rickolsen on Jul 31, 2017 21:14:35 GMT -5
When Elvis was asked questions about controversial or political issues like the Vietnam War his response was, "I'd prefer to keep my personal feelings about that to myself because I'm just an entertainer." Jacke should say the same thing. "I love my sister, but..."
|
|
|
Post by rogeraphil on Jul 31, 2017 22:27:13 GMT -5
Jackie loves music, her fans, and her career. BUT, she loves her sister more. I cringe to even think about it, but if push comes to shove, Jackie will choose her sister OVER her career !!! No... she is choosing equality and diversity over bigotry and discrimination. Her career has nothing to do with it. There are far more that agree with her than not. In an interview, Jackie has already stated that she would drop her career cold if it ever got in the way of her Family values, or caused any difficulties within her Family, so yes, her career DOES enter into things !!!
|
|
|
Post by ads on Jul 31, 2017 23:47:50 GMT -5
When Elvis was asked questions about controversial or political issues like the Vietnam War his response was, "I'd prefer to keep my personal feelings about that to myself because I'm just an entertainer." Jackie should say the same thing. "I love my sister, but..." I'm kind of on the fence on this Rick, I do see the valour, and this is what Jackie implied when the performed at the inauguration. However this video has a very strong message about the responsibility of those privileged to be given a voice through the arts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2017 0:51:07 GMT -5
I believe Jackie will not compromise her devotion to Juliet and her loyalty to family. If she were to do so, she would not be the Jackie Evancho I've come to know and love. She may continue her singing career in whatever capacity is made available to her while remaining faithful to her principles, but I don't believe she will sacrifice family values for the sake of advancing a career for herself. She will find a balance somehow because she loves singing and bringing joy to others as much as she loves her family. I believe she is prepared to accept that she may not be as successful as she might have been as a result of doing what she feels she must in support of her sister, Juliet. And, I am prepared as well to enjoy whatever she is able to bring to us without selfish expectation. It's her gift, however she is able to offer it. She is an honorable and gallant young lady who has my respect and admiration.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2017 8:17:30 GMT -5
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Bigotry and discrimination are not "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". EDIT: You left out the 14th amendment. Dang former Busby1, Busby2, xyzzy1, xyzzy2, Ragnarok1, Ragnarok2, Blotus1, Blotus2, Alfred1, Alfred2, Busby3, Busby4, and currently Busby5, Did you hear anyone say "Bigotry and discrimination IS "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?" Golly gee bbxxrrbbaabb and yet again b, some people would say you and others of your ilk are simple minded, but not me. No sir! Ol' agog has the utmost respect for your reading comprehension skills and your obvious intelligence. As for your noticing I left out the fourteenth amendment when I discussed our bill of rights, which is the first ten amendments to our constitution... well it's easy to see we can add "math wiz" to your liberal accolades. You are so good. Such a good person. And mentally stable too! A real live brainiac. Pity the one who takes you on in reasoned debate. Busby, etc's statement was factual. You "left out" not only the 14th, but all the other amendments. Not just the first 10, but all of them must be considered in a discussion of constitutional rights. Also I noticed you didn't have much to say about the 9th. The 14th, in part: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." And I must say, anyone with an understanding of sarcasm has no trouble recognizing your post as a string of personal insults. In my opinion, it certainly doesn't qualify as reasoned debate..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2017 9:40:16 GMT -5
"Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2017 9:50:56 GMT -5
"Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. 14 hours ago agog and jrchico are LOLing at this. 16 hours ago rickolsen said: "Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. ?? "agog and jrchico are LOLing at this." ?? I have never seen admin showing this type of bias before. In fact I thought the omission of a "thumbs" down would indicate this type of hate was not acceptable to them, but as any rule, it doesn't apply to them.
|
|
|
Post by jrchico on Aug 1, 2017 13:30:57 GMT -5
If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. 14 hours ago agog and jrchico are LOLing at this. 16 hours ago rickolsen said: "Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. ?? "agog and jrchico are LOLing at this." ?? I have never seen admin showing this type of bias before. In fact I thought the omission of a "thumbs" down would indicate this type of hate was not acceptable to them, but as any rule, it doesn't apply to them. Maybe you haven't noticed but we don't have a thumbs down button here. If you don't like a comment say why or deal with it. We are laughing because we don't figure Rick is going to ban anyone for personal reasons because he would have to get the ok from the other Admins and for the reasons you stated he would probably not get that ok.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2017 20:20:32 GMT -5
14 hours ago agog and jrchico are LOLing at this. 16 hours ago rickolsen said: "Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. ?? "agog and jrchico are LOLing at this." ?? I have never seen admin showing this type of bias before. In fact I thought the omission of a "thumbs" down would indicate this type of hate was not acceptable to them, but as any rule, it doesn't apply to them. Maybe you haven't noticed but we don't have a thumbs down button here. If you don't like a comment say why or deal with it. We are laughing because we don't figure Rick is going to ban anyone for personal reasons because he would have to get the ok from the other Admins and for the reasons you stated he would probably not get that ok. LOLing at this.
|
|
|
Post by agog on Aug 2, 2017 4:17:28 GMT -5
Dang former Busby1, Busby2, xyzzy1, xyzzy2, Ragnarok1, Ragnarok2, Blotus1, Blotus2, Alfred1, Alfred2, Busby3, Busby4, and currently Busby5, Did you hear anyone say "Bigotry and discrimination IS "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?" Golly gee bbxxrrbbaabb and yet again b, some people would say you and others of your ilk are simple minded, but not me. No sir! Ol' agog has the utmost respect for your reading comprehension skills and your obvious intelligence. As for your noticing I left out the fourteenth amendment when I discussed our bill of rights, which is the first ten amendments to our constitution... well it's easy to see we can add "math wiz" to your liberal accolades. You are so good. Such a good person. And mentally stable too! A real live brainiac. Pity the one who takes you on in reasoned debate. Busby, etc's statement was factual. You "left out" not only the 14th, but all the other amendments. Not just the first 10, but all of them must be considered in a discussion of constitutional rights. Also I noticed you didn't have much to say about the 9th. The 14th, in part: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." And I must say, anyone with an understanding of sarcasm has no trouble recognizing your post as a string of personal insults. In my opinion, it certainly doesn't qualify as reasoned debate.. LOL " Busby etc." Brilliant! That's much more compact than even the "bbxxrrbbaabb and yet again b", that I used to shorten the entire "former Busby1, Busby2, xyzzy1, xyzzy2, Ragnarok1, Ragnarok2, Blotus1, Blotus2, Alfred1, Alfred2, Busby3, Busby4, and currently Busby5" that I used to address Busby etc's post. That represents the thirteen times he's joined, quit and rejoined this site under six names. At least the last three times he came back as Busby. And I, for one, celebrate each little step towards normalcy. But let me get to addressing your defense of Busby etc. Shrodinger says: "Busby etc's [<---I just love that ] statement was factual." He (Busby etc.) said "Bigotry and discrimination are not "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." By George you are both correct! Bigotry and discrimination are NOT life, liberty etc. Then again neither is a 1956 Chevrolet Bel Air convertible, nor Imelda Marcos's shoe collection. Why didn't he say a '56 chevy or Imelda M? After all I didn't say a '56 chevy, or Imelda's shoes, or bigotry and discrimination, were life liberty etc either. Why does Busby etc have such hatred for Imelda and chevy convertibles? But perhaps i'm too harsh. Maybe it's just that he has a talent for non-sequiturs. "You "left out" not only the 14th, but all the other amendments." How very observant of you Shrodinger. When one is explaining the "Bill of Rights" (which IS BY DEFINITION the first ten amendments to our constitution) to a non-American fan one does not mix in with one's post the Declaration of Independence (where "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is found) nor '56 chevys nor Imelda's scandalous shoe collection nor any other constitutional amendment that is NOT in the bill of rights. If you wish to discuss the fourteenth amendment with Juxtaposer or any other fan here, by all means do so Shrodinger. Same for Busby etc. As for your last paragraph, I find no error either logically or factually. Libs truly are smart and good people. If you don't believe me just ask one.
|
|
|
Post by agog on Aug 2, 2017 4:30:01 GMT -5
If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. 14 hours ago agog and jrchico are LOLing at this. 16 hours ago rickolsen said: "Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. ?? "agog and jrchico are LOLing at this." ?? I have never seen admin showing this type of bias before. In fact I thought the omission of a "thumbs" down would indicate this type of hate was not acceptable to them, but as any rule, it doesn't apply to them. I'm not LOLing at it. I'm LOLing with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 6:43:52 GMT -5
14 hours ago agog and jrchico are LOLing at this. 16 hours ago rickolsen said: "Window Lickers" is a derogatory term used against people who are mentally handicapped. So Lisa, with all her whining and Juliet's whining about discrimination, name calling, etc is a bigot. Ironic isn't it. If anyone on the forum calls you a bigot Rick you would tell them off, delete their comment and ban them. ?? "agog and jrchico are LOLing at this." ?? I have never seen admin showing this type of bias before. In fact I thought the omission of a "thumbs" down would indicate this type of hate was not acceptable to them, but as any rule, it doesn't apply to them. I'm not LOLing at it. I'm LOLing with it. If you are NOT LOLing AT IT you sould have your name removed from where it says you ARE LOLing AT IT
|
|
|
Post by agog on Aug 2, 2017 11:15:36 GMT -5
I'm not LOLing at it. I'm LOLing with it. If you are NOT LOLing AT IT you sould have your name removed from were it says you ARE LOLing AT IT Pharaoh says: Strike his name from the annals of Egypt? Take it up with Admin. Not sure if he can change it
|
|